Skip to main content
· 10/16/2000

Donald McCormick v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 230 F.3d 319
  • 48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 765
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 25686
  • 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,450
  • 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1869
  • 2000 WL 1521759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Rule 8 requires just enough “to allow the court and the defendant to understand the gravamen of the plaintiffs complaint”
  • stating that plaintiff need only plead enough “to allow the court and the defendant to understand the gravamen of the plaintiffs complaint”
  • finding that a party’s deliberate choice, later regretted, did not constitute a “mistake” within the meaning of Rule 60(b)(1)
  • explaining that “neither ignorance nor carelessness on the part of the litigant or his attorney provide grounds for relief under Rule 60(b)(1)”
  • noting that a plaintiff may “plead himself out of court” by alleging facts establishing that a defendant is entitled to prevail on a motion to dismiss
  • noting that a plaintiff may “plead himself out of court” by alleging facts establishing that a defendant is entitled to prevail on a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Manton, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.