Donald Martin v. E-Z Mart Stores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding circumstantial evidence was insufficient to allow the jury to infer a defect in a cigarette lighter
• holding evidence was insufficient to allow the jury to infer a defect in a cigarette lighter
• “With no evidence supporting the negation of other causes such as wear and tear or misuse, the [plaintiffs] have not made a case for the trier of facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).