Donald M. Paradis v. A.J. Arave

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing we may affirm the district court’s decision on any ground supported by the record, even if it differs from the district court’s rationale
• prosecutor’s notes, although not admissible, could have been used to contradict a key medical witness and nondisclosure was Brady violation
• “It is true that if the verdict is supported by overwhelming evidence of guilt, then undisclosed exculpatory evidence that undermines only a small part of the prosecution’s case may not be sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome” under Brady.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).