Skip to main content
· 12/4/2002

Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane Does

Citations

  • 316 F.3d 822
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 13661
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11674
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 652
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Rule 12(h)(3) 19 permits a district court to “raise the question of subject matter jurisdiction[] sua sponte”
  • noting that Rule 12(h)(3) 19 permits a district court to “raise the question of subject matter jurisdiction[] sua sponte”
  • noting Rule 12(h)(3) permits a district court to “raise 4 the question of subject matter jurisdiction[] sua sponte”
  • “[A] court may raise the question of subject matter 18 jurisdiction, sua sponte, at any time during the pendency of the action, even on appeal.”
  • “[A] court may raise the 8 question of subject matter jurisdiction, sua sponte, at any time during the pendency of the 9 action.”
  • “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) provides that a court may raise the question of subject matter jurisdiction, sua sponte, at any time during the pendency of the action, even on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trott, Nelson, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.