Skip to main content
· 10/18/1993

Donald Hateley, the Cambridge Group, and Wendy Seretan v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Citations

  • 8 F.3d 653
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 13132
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7690
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26840
  • 1993 WL 409746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioners’ “unjust enrichment” was limited to the fees they actually retained
  • holding that the disgorgement judgment is not “a fine levied against the petitioners as pun- ishment for their conduct” but rather “is the means by which the petition- ers are required to remedy the unjust enrichment”
  • the proper disgorgement amount is the amount of commissions retained by Prime Atlantic, rather than the total amount received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farris, Norris, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.