· 10/18/1993
Donald Hateley, the Cambridge Group, and Wendy Seretan v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Citations
- 8 F.3d 653
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 13132
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7690
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26840
- 1993 WL 409746
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the petitioners’ “unjust enrichment” was limited to the fees they actually retained
- holding that the disgorgement judgment is not “a fine levied against the petitioners as pun- ishment for their conduct” but rather “is the means by which the petition- ers are required to remedy the unjust enrichment”
- the proper disgorgement amount is the amount of commissions retained by Prime Atlantic, rather than the total amount received
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farris, Norris, Reinhardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.