Skip to main content
· 6/13/1989

Donald F. Buxton v. City of Plant City, Florida, Troy E. Surrency, Individually, Troy E. Surrency, in His Official Capacity

Citations

  • 871 F.2d 1037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that opportunity to clear name in post-termination hearing is enough to satisfy due process
  • rejecting defendants arguments that information was required by statute so there was no intent to make the information public
  • explaining the Fifth Amendment governs the conduct of federal actors, whereas the Fourteenth Amendment governs the conduct of state actors
  • “providing a termination notice . . . did not constitute a deprivation of [liberty] because the notice did not contain any reasons for his discharge, much less false or stigmatizing information.”
  • “Property interests protected by procedural due process ex- tend well beyond actual ownership of real estate, chattels, or money.”
  • “Property interests protected by procedural due process ex- tend well beyond actual ownership of real estate, chattels, or money.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roney, Hatchett, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.