· 6/13/1989
Donald F. Buxton v. City of Plant City, Florida, Troy E. Surrency, Individually, Troy E. Surrency, in His Official Capacity
Citations
- 871 F.2d 1037
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that opportunity to clear name in post-termination hearing is enough to satisfy due process
- rejecting defendants arguments that information was required by statute so there was no intent to make the information public
- explaining the Fifth Amendment governs the conduct of federal actors, whereas the Fourteenth Amendment governs the conduct of state actors
- “providing a termination notice . . . did not constitute a deprivation of [liberty] because the notice did not contain any reasons for his discharge, much less false or stigmatizing information.”
- “Property interests protected by procedural due process ex- tend well beyond actual ownership of real estate, chattels, or money.”
- “Property interests protected by procedural due process ex- tend well beyond actual ownership of real estate, chattels, or money.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roney, Hatchett, Henderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.