DONALD EDWARD GRAHAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Ohio law and holding that, while plaintiff’s recovery under a warranty theory was barred by his unreasonable use of the product, plaintiff was entitled to trial on his negligence claim under Ohio’s comparative negligence statute
• stating that product need not be “foolproof’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).