Donald D. Gronholz v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that we lack jurisdiction over an appeal in which the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed with- out prejudice all patent-infringement claims prior to the appeal
• discussing the distinction between Rule 41(a), which applies to an “action” and Rule 41(b), which references “claims” and “actions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).