Donald D. Decker v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that hypothetical questions to the VE must reflect with precision all of claimant’s impairments and limitations that are borne out by the evidentiary record
• holding that hypothetical question to VE need only include impairments supported by evidentiary record
• holding that because the ALJ’s findings regarding the claimant’s conditions were “accurately reflected in the ALJ’s hypothetical inquiries, the [VE’s] testimony provided substantial evidence” to support the decision
• stating that, while hypotheticals to VE must precisely reflect impairments, “they need only reflect impairments and limitations that are borne out by the evidentiary record”
• holding hypothetical questions need only reflect impairments and limitations borne out by the evidentiary record
• stating that, while hypotheticals to VE must precisely reflect impairments, “they need only reflect impairments and limitations that are borne out by the evidentiary record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).