Donald Carter Kathryn S. Carter v. Health Net of California, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitions for confirmation or vacatur must show how the ultimate disposition of the matter by the federal court necessarily depends on resolution of a substantial question of federal law
• holding that “[i]t is well-established that even when a petition is brought under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), a petitioner 1. whether the permanent injunction issued by the district court complied with the standards of Rule 65(d
• “Errors of fact do not generally constitute manifest disregard” of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).