Donald Billizon, and Danos & Curole Marine Contractors, Inc. And the Gray Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellants v. Conoco, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding borrowed employee status satisfied even though third factor weighed against finding and seventh factor was neutral
• noting that, while the borrowed servant was paid by the lending employer, his pay was based on time tickets verified by the borrowing employer, and determining that this factor did not support the borrowing employer’s contention that the servant was not borrowed
• “D & C paid Billizon, but his pay was based on time tickets verified by Conoco.”
• “The service contract governing the relationship between Conoco and D & C provides that employees of D & C are not employees of Conoco.”
• “However, the reality of the work site and the actions of Conoco and D & C suggest that the two employers had the contrary ‘understanding or meeting of the minds.’ ”
• “[T]he reality of the work site and the actions of Conoco and D & C suggest that [despite the contract provision] the two employers had the contrary ‘understanding or meeting of the minds.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).