Donald B. Huffman v. WorkForce West Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to conduct federal habeas review where New York’s appellate court found claim to be procedurally barred under § 440.10(2)(c)
• “Since [petitioner] has failed to show cause, there is no need to address the prejudice requirement, and federal habeas review . . . is unavailable”
• “Since [petitioner] has failed to show cause, there is no need to address the prejudice requirement, and federal habeas review ... is unavailable”
• “Since [petitioner] has failed to show cause, there is no need to address the prejudice requirement, and federal habeas review . . . is unavailable”
• \Habeas review is not prohibited . . . unless the last state court rendering a judgment in the case clearly and expressly states that its judgment rests on a state procedural bar.\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).