Donahue v. Veridiem, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that court previously had ‘‘referred to [§ 31-294c (b
• \[a] conclusive or irrebuttable presumption is ... a substantive rule of law\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• § 1-2z ‘‘permits resort to extratextual sources, such as amendments to the statute, [only] after there is a determination that the text is ambiguous’’
• ‘‘[a] conclusive or irrebuttable presumption is . . . a substantive rule of law’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• § 31-294c [b] is not plain and unambiguous on issue of employer's role once preclusion has been granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).