Donahue-Jones v. Roberts
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2726
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by granting appellees' motion to dismiss appellant's complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) where appellant's allegations that appellees had acted recklessly by entrusting appellant's 16-year-old daughter to operate the appellees' all-terrain vehicle were nothing more than bare legal conclusions that were not supported by any operative facts so as to overcome the appellees' motion to dismiss given the clear application of the primary assumption of risk doctrine to the case at bar.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.