Skip to main content
· 9/11/1978

Donaghey v. Attorney General

Citations

  • 584 P.2d 557
  • 120 Ariz. 93
  • 1978 Ariz. LEXIS 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence was sufficient to establish that the substance was noncontrolled where “the criminalist testified that the substance was not heroin or cocaine and that he had eliminated 80 to 90 percent of all controlled substances”
  • discussing the “long established principle” that the Attorney General may be compelled to initiate a quo warranto action if “a franchise is being unlawfully exercised” or usurped
  • noting a strong public policy favoring stability and finality of public elections
  • noting a strong public policy favoring stability and finality of public elections
  • electoral challenges months after an election “erode the stability of ... governments by calling into question the legitimacy” of interim acts
  • electoral challenges months after an election \erode the stability of ... governments by calling into question the legitimacy\ of interim acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.