Skip to main content
· 5/11/1971

Donadio v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 277 A.2d 375
  • 58 N.J. 309
  • 1971 N.J. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that \a court should not reach and determine a constitutional issue unless absolutely imperative in the disposition of the litigation\
  • emphasizing that “a court should not reach and determine a constitutional issue unless absolutely imperative in the disposition of the litigation”
  • emphasizing that “a court should not reach and determine a constitutional issue unless absolutely imperative in the disposition of the litigation”
  • emphasizing that \a court should not reach and determine a constitutional issue unless absolutely imperative in the disposition of the litigation\
  • noting rule that “a court should not reach and determine a constitutional issue unless absolutely imperative in the disposition of the litigation”
  • stating that “relief by way of a declaratory judgment should be withheld, when the request is in effect an attempt to have the court adjudicate in advance the validity of a possible defense in some expected future law suit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.