Donaciano CARINO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA BOARD OF REGENTS, Defendants-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that accent or “language difficulties that interfere with performance of [an employee’s] duties may be legitimately considered in employment decisions”
• suggesting that accent or “language difficulties that interfere with performance of [an employee’s] duties may be legitimately considered in employment decisions”
• suggesting that accent or “language difficulties that interfere with performance of [an employee’s] duties may be legitimately considered in employment decisions”
• suggesting that accent or “language difficulties that interfere with performance of [an employee’s] duties may be legitimately considered in employment decisions”
• evidence that an employee was demoted on the basis of his accent sufficient to establish discriminatory intent based on national origin
• “A foreign accent that does not interfere with a Title VII claimant’s ability to perform the duties of the position he has been denied is not a legitimate justification for adverse employment 10 decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).