Don McGuire v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Columbia Broadcasting System Films, Inc., and General Foods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that an evidentiary hearing would be permitted but holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in quashing a subpoena for oral testimony
• “Rule 56 F.R.C.P. is silent as to the taking of oral testimony at a hearing on a motion for summary judgment, but Rule 43(e) F.R.C.P. clearly states that the Court may direct that the matter (of the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).