Skip to main content
· 5/18/1950

Don McCullagh, Inc. v. Dimitroff

Citations

  • 42 N.W.2d 775
  • 327 Mich. 656
  • 1950 Mich. LEXIS 495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, because the undisputed evidence showed that the plaintiff continued to use the car and waived his right to rescind as a matter of law, the trial court should have directed a verdict in the defendant’s favor on the issue of rescission
  • concluding that, because the undisputed evidence showed that the plaintiff continued to use the car and waived his right to rescind as a matter of law, the trial court should have directed a verdict in the defendant’s favor on the issue of rescission
  • reciting the conditions that apply when a party wishes to assert the right of rescission
  • reciting the conditions that apply when a party wishes to assert the right of rescission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dethmers, Boyles, Reid, North, Butzel, Carr, Bushnell, Sharpe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.