Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a district court should ordinarily grant discovery where relevant jurisdictional facts \are controverted or where a more satisfactory showing of the facts is necessary.\
• holding that the ROD and EIS for a program were final agency action
• holding that party seeking discovery must show that denial resulted in prejudice
• noting that when one plaintiff is determined to have standing, the Court need not consider whether additional plaintiffs have standing
• requiring that the party make “the clearest showing” that 3 “there is a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different had discovery been allowed”
• holding 22 that courts should permit jurisdictional discovery if there is a “‘reasonable probability’ that 23 the outcome” might “be different” based on the factual showing in the original motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).