DON L. TULLIS & ASSOCIATES v. Benge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s decision that an undefined term in the agreement was not essential and was sufficiently specific to give it a definition
• affirming a jury’s finding that a meeting of the minds occurred even when an alleg- edly essential term was left undefined because the “parties know- ingly, thoughtfully and deliberately entered th[e] agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).