Don Kirshner, and Schumaier, Roberts & McKinsey v. Uniden Corporation of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that documents submitted to the district court after it made the ruling challenged on appeal are excluded from the record
• considering only record before the district court at time it made the decision being reviewed
• appellate court cannot consider items not presented to the trial court when it made its decision
• “Papers submitted to the district court after the ruling that is challenged on appeal should be stricken from the record on appeal.”
• appellate courts consider only the “record before the trial judge when his decision was made”
• papers neither filed with the court, 25 admitted into evidence, nor otherwise considered generally cannot be part of the record on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).