Don Camby Lowther v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where government “destroyed appellee’s property without having any authority in law to do it,” its actions were “contrary to the [D]ue [P]rocess [C]lause of the Fifth Amendment”
• the Government’s continued retention of seized property would constitute a taking without just compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).