Domond v. Great American Recreation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “willfulness may be inferred where a party’s conduct was egregious and not adequately explained”
• “Because the Defendants’ motion to dismiss is based upon an alleged lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2
• “A majority of courts have held that transferring an action is more appropriate than dismissal when such action will likely cause future statute of limitations problems.”
• “The mere residence or domicile in New York of an injured plaintiff does not constitute injury within the state for the purposes of establishing jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(3) where the injury occurred elsewhere.”
• “ ‘[t]o hold otherwise would open a veritable Pandora’s box of litigation subjecting every conceivable prospective defendant involved in an accident with a New York domiciliary to defend against actions brought against them in the state of New York’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).