Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 6/17/2014

Dominique v. Artus

Citations

  • 25 F. Supp. 3d 321
  • 2014 WL 2740581
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases discussing the type of evidence that would be required to demonstrate actual innocence
  • finding the rule that record-based claims “cannot serve as the basis for relief [in a post-conviction motion to vacate] is firmly established and regularly followed in New York” (collecting cases)
  • claim that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to seek leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals without consulting the petition was unexhausted because it could be brought in a successive coram nobis application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kuntz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.