Skip to main content
· 4/7/2000

Dominion of Canada v. STATE FARM AND CAS. CO.

Citations

  • 754 So. 2d 852
  • 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4174
  • 2000 WL 353942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the limitations period for filing an equitable subrogation action begins when the subrogee makes payment to the subrogor
  • holding that the limitations period for filing an equitable subro-gation action begins when the subrogee makes payment to the subrogor
  • noting that the statute does not impose final resolution as a condition precedent or employ language that no action for subrogation may be filed until then, listing examples
  • noting that the statute does not impose final resolution as a condition precedent or employ language that no action for subrogation may be filed until then, listing examples
  • addressing whether the trial court erred by “dismissing the action with prejudice, holding that the complaint on its face established that the statute of limitations on a subrogation claim expired before the filing of the complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.