Dominick v. Brockton-Taunton Gas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The expert’s testimony as to a safe method [of installation] referred to in a bulletin in 1963 had no relevance as to the [earlier] year the installation was made”
• evidence of 1963 safety standards irrelevant to show 1959 standard of care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).