Dominick Urso v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he meaning of a regulation is a question of law for the court, not of fact for the jury.”
• \[We] decline[ ] to entertain [an] appeal[ ] when the appellant does not file a required appendix.\
• “Rule 50 is designed to flush out reasons so that errors may be prevented without the need for appellate intervention.”
• “Rule 50 is designed to flush out reasons so that errors may be prevented without the need for appellate intervention.”
• “[We] decline[] to entertain [an] appeal[] when the appellant does not file a required appendix.”
• “Rule 50 is designed to flush out reasons so that errors may be prevented without the need for appellate intervention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).