Skip to main content
· 7/13/2011

Dominic v. Eurocar Classics

Citations

  • 714 S.E.2d 388
  • 310 Ga. App. 825
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2426
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the argument that a party is a third-party beneficiary under a contract is a legal conclusion
  • owner of car not third-party beneficiary of contract between mechanic and dealership that performed repair at mechanic’s request
  • “As a general rule, one not in privity of contract with another lacks standing to assert any claims arising from violations of the contract.”
  • “As a general 4 rule, one not in privity of contract with another lacks standing to assert any claims arising from violations of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Ellington, Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.