Dominguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he unexplained possession of property recently stolen is a sufficient circumstance to authorize a jury to convict for theft of the property.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wells v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 37×
• Key v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-04-11· cited 27×
• Resendez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-27· cited 18×
• Ignacio Albert Marban v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2009-08-26