Dolven v. First National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the plaintiff’s “attorney’s fees 21 incurred for postjudgment enforcement of the district court’s orders and the consent decree 22 were compensable under the PLRA”
• distinguishing Hollywood v. City of Santa Maria, 886 F.2d 1228, 1231–32 (9th Cir. 1989)
• distinguishing Hollywood v. City of Santa Maria, 886 F.2d 1228, 1231–32 (9th Cir. 1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).