Dolphin v. Garraghty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in “steer[ing] a middle course between the extreme remedy of exclusion and the possibility of unfair prejudice to the plaintiff”
• affirming district court’s decision not to exclude a witness where the plaintiff had the opportunity to re-examine the witness and recall his own expert
• \We express no opinion as to whether a showing of bad faith is required before evidence may be excluded under Rule 37(c)(1).\
• “The imposition of sanctions for abuse of discovery under [Rule] 37 is a matter within the discretion of the trial court.”
• “The imposition of sanctions for abuse of discovery . . . is a matter within the discretion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).