Dolph v. Pennsylvania Higher Education, Assistance Agency (In Re Dolph)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that although unpublished decisions are not binding precedent, they may be cited if persuasive, especially where there are no published decisions that will serve as well
• noting that the debtor bears the burden of demonstrating undue hardship
• discussing the test for determining undue hardship, citing Cheesman v. Tennessee Student Assistance Corp. (In re Cheesman), 25 F.3d 356 (6th Cir.1994)
• “Where facts which will support a judgment can be inferred from a [trial] court’s other findings, an appellate court will deem that such inferences were drawn.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).