Dolores Howard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the plaintiffs slight evidence in slip and fall case could support the jury verdict, “though surely only by a hair’s breadth”
• holding that “a district court’s decision does not have precedential authority”
• a business “is not required to patrol the aisles continuously, but only at reasonable intervals”
• a business “is not required to patrol the aisles continuously, but only at reasonable intervals”
• spilled soap was in aisle of grocery store and employees had stocked the shelves that morning
• store owner “not required to patrol the aisles continuously, but only at reasonable intervals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).