Dollar v. NationsBank of Georgia, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a bank “had no duty to [its customer] to accurately make” a flood hazard determination
• holding that because the plaintiff and defendant were in an arm’s length loan transaction the defendant owed no fiduciary duty to the plaintiff
• noting that the lender and the borrower “were involved in an arm’s length mortgage transaction” rather than a “confidential relationship” regarding the need for flood insurance
• noting that “[the bank’s] determination as to whether or not [the borrower’s] residence was in a flood hazard zone was made, not for [the borrower’s] benefit, but for the purpose of protecting the bank’s interest in its collateral”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).