Skip to main content
· 4/17/1984

Dollar Systems, Inc. v. Tomlin

Citations

  • 102 F.R.D. 93
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 755
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiffs expert witness was not disqualified even though he had previously worked for the defense on a related matter
  • asking whether the moving party was unduly disadvantaged and the opposing party unduly advantaged
  • finding no basis to disqualify an expert noting that expert did not derive any of his specific ideas from work done under party’s direction or using its funds.
  • “There appears to be little case law dealing with the issue of disqualification of expert witnesses”
  • attorneys occupy “a position of higher trust, with concomitant fiduciary duties, to a client than does an expert consultant”
  • expert not disqualified where prior exchanges did not involve the subject matter of the suit and could not have impacted expert’s approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neese

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.