Dolfi v. Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant did not abuse its discretion by determining that it could not conclude, based on plaintiff’s medical records, that her “pain complaints or other medical conditions would preclude [her] ability to work in a sedentary or light duty work capacity”
• medical consultants’ findings that the plaintiff’s subjective complaints of pain are inconsistent with the objective evidence available is not arbitrary and capricious
• “Radiculopathy can be diagnosed through objective evidence such as MRIs, EMGs, and nerve conduction studies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).