Skip to main content
· 4/26/1990

Dole v. Walker & Armstrong

Citations

  • 763 F. Supp. 1052
  • 1990 WL 294223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing trade libel claim where \it is not even clear if this allegation [of lost sales] is connected to counterdefendants' [libel]\
  • finding online posting “is entirely premised on a series of verifiably false statements of [alleged] fact.”
  • noting 8 that special damages are actual out-of-pocket losses and must be pled with specificity
  • “Cases construing the term ‘public 11 forum’ as used in section 425.16 have noted that the term is traditionally defined as a place that is 12 open to the public where information is freely exchanged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broomfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.