Dole v. Drywall Tapers & Finishers Local Union 1976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \a party may move to strike class claims even before discovery\
• holding that plaintiff adequately stated an EPA claim by identifying a higher-earning male comparator and asserting that his “qualifications, experience, and responsibilities were no greater” than hers
• holding that “a plaintiff generally lacks standing to seek injunctive or declaratory relief against his or her former employer, as there is no prospect that he or she will be injured in the future”
• noting that “the Second Circuit has reserved judgment” on the issue of “[w]hether or not a female plaintiff must identify a specific male comparator”
• noting that to establish a prima facie claim of retaliation, plaintiff must show “a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action”
• finding that “the EPA does not afford a remedy for denial of promotions[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).