Dolcy v. Rhode Island Joint Reinsurance Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the policy’s intentional loss exclusion referring to “an insured” imposes a joint obligation
• where clause excludes coverage for damage intentionally caused by “an insured,” obligation is joint as to all coinsureds, and innocent coinsured may not recover
• all indicating that the “any insured” or “an insured” policy language denotes joint liability, which voids the entire policy if one coinsured engaged in wrongdoing
• policy excluded coverage for losses caused by \an insured\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).