Dolan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Any argument that a copy of an online document . . . can be admitted . . . without any predicate testimony to establish its authenticity or to prove the truth of its content . . . borders on the frivolous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• ARKHEEM J. LAMB v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-02· cited 12×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Harbaugh
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-03-09· cited 60×
• Stoll v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-06· cited 54×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 49×
• Cordova v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-29· cited 13×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-26· cited 10×
• Seago v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-06· cited 8×
• Warren v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-09-14· cited 8×
• Sustakoski v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-24· cited 7×
• Wencel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-23· cited 5×
• Keith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-09· cited 4×
• State v. Rothwell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-27· cited 3×
• In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-07-11· cited 2×
• Ward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-27· cited 2×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-12· cited 1×