DoIt Hosp. Del. LLC v. Reuben Bros. Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enforcing an order based on a theory of violation not alleged but fully litigated
• “[E]mployees are also free to use concerted activities to seek reinstatement of the employee.”
• \The right of employees to engage in activity guaranteed by Section 7 of the [NLRA] should not be subject to defeasance merely because the employer believes he is not violating the Act in restraining the employee in his exercise of such rights.\
• “The right of employees to engage in activity guaranteed by Section 7 of the [NLRA] should not be subject to defeasance merely because the employer believes he is not violating the Act in restraining the employee in his exercise of such rights.”
• issue obvious, fully litigated, no prejudice shown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).