Skip to main content

Dogra v. Liles

Citations

  • 2013 NV 100
  • 129 Nev. 932
  • 314 P.3d 952
  • 129 Nev. Adv. Rep. 100
  • 2013 WL 6835017
  • 2013 Nev. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that specific personal jurisdiction can be based either on purposeful availment or on purposefully directed conduct
  • explaining that this court reviews a district court's factual findings regarding personal jurisdiction for clear error
  • providing that specific personal jurisdiction can be based either on purposeful availment or on purposefully directed conduct
  • providing that specific personal jurisdiction can be based either on purposeful availment or on purposefully directed conduct
  • \[T]he mere unilateral activity of those who claim some relationship with a nonresident defendant cannot satisfy the requirement of contact with the forum State.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flanagan, Pickering, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Cherry, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Dogra v. Liles

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.