Dogmanits v. Capital Blue Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employees who exceed the twelve weeks of FMLA leave “stand to lose their entitlement to job restoration even if their employers provide additional, non-FMLA, leave.”
• holding that employees who exhaust the 12 weeks of leave provided by the FMLA stand to lose their entitlement to job restoration even if their employers provide additional, non-FMLA leave
• \[E]mployees who exhaust the twelve weeks of leave provided under the FMLA stand to lose their entitlement to job restoration . . . .\
• “[E]mployees who exhaust the twelve weeks of leave provided under the FMLA stand to lose their entitlement to job restoration . . . .”
• “employees who exhaust the twelve weeks of leave provided under the FMLA stand to lose their entitlement to job restoration even if their employers provide additional, non-FMLA, leave.”
• “employees who exhaust the twelve weeks of leave provided under the FMLA stand to lose their entitlement to job restoration even if their employers provide additional, non-FMLA, leave.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).