Dogbe v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs Section 1983 claims in connection with altercations with flight attendants and ground crew while he was on. board plane for international flight were “preempted by the [Warsaw and Montreal] Conventions”
• finding Section 1983 claims preempted by the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions
• “There can be no question that plaintiff's challenge to Delta's . . . boarding procedures . . . is preempted by the ADA.”
• “Plaintiff’s forcible removal as the result of his refusal to comply with Delta’s order to disembark the airplane does not constitute an accident.”
• “In light of the substantial parity of Article 17 in each convention, the court will . . . look to precedent interpreting Article 17 of both conventions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).