Dogan v. Bloodworth

Citations

• 56 Miss. 419

Syllabus

<p>1- A-GívicultuhA.L Lien-Law. Writ of seizure. Replevin for property seized.</p> <p>Property seized and held by an officer, under a writ of seizure sued out by a landlord under the Agricultural Lien-Law of 1870, cannot be taken out of his possession by a writ of replevin sued out at the instance of a stranger to the lien suit.</p> <p>2. Same. Writ of seizure. Defective, not void.</p> <p>A writ of seizure under the Agricultural Lien-Law of 1876, which commands the seizure of the agricultural product, but names no defendant and contains no personal summons, is not void, and the officer who has seized property thereunder can hold it.</p> <p>3. Special Bill of Exceptions. Contents.</p> <p>Where a case comes up on a special bill of exceptions, all the evidence need not be embodied therein, but only enough to show the error committed.</p>