Skip to main content
· 5/17/1996

Does 1 v. Chandler

Citations

  • 83 F.3d 1150
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 5653
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3466
  • 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 849
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “For the purposes of equal protection analysis, the disabled do not constitute a suspect class.”
  • “A district court’s order regarding preliminary injunctive relief is subject to limited review. . . .”
  • “[A] plaintiff proceeding under Title II of the ADA must, similar to a Section 504 plaintiff, prove that the exclusion from participation in the program was ‘solely by reason of disability.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.