Doering v. Doering

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing standard for fraud under Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd. 2, and stating that supreme court has “noted that rule 60.02 was an improper vehicle for attempting to vacate dissolution judgments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).