Doerfler v. Doerfler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the CIA's obligation to provide a sworn declaration supporting the exemption was not triggered until the plaintiff alleged that the exemption was improperly asserted
• holding that the CIA’s obligation to provide a sworn declaration supporting the exemption was not triggered until the plaintiff alleged that the exemption was improperly asserted
• holding that an agency need not use plaintiff's suggested search terms because they were \extremely broad and would likely produce a greater number of unresponsive documents than the more targeted search terms employed by the agency\
• finding Exemption 3 satisfied when the CIA withheld “classification markings,” “routing information,” and “dissemination control information”
• declining to require the search term “Stasi,” 11 the common nickname for the East German secret police, when the full word, “Staatssicherheit,” had already been used
• finding search, adequate based on affidavit containing required assertions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).