Doe v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[G]roup-wide descriptions ____appear[ ] to be too broad ... to seriously allow a claim of confidentiality.”
• SB compelled to produce five documents where it failed to identify author or recipient
• “The burden is on the party asserting the privilege to provide the court with the applicable foreign law, and demonstrate that the privilege applies to the documents it seeks to exclude from discovery.”
• “The burden is on the party asserting the privilege to provide the court with the applicable foreign law, and demonstrate that the privilege applies to the documents it seeks to exclude from discovery.”
• summary of legal advice sent from one non-attorney to another privileged
• “[T]he description of each document and its contents [submitted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)] must be sufficiently detailed to allow the court to determine whether the elements of [the privilege] have been established. Failing this, the documents must be produced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).